Layout:
Home > Regretting Too Little Debt? More on College

Regretting Too Little Debt? More on College

September 19th, 2011 at 11:22 pm

I read this article and couldn't help but think, "How many people out there regret taking on too little debt?"

Get Smart About College
Parents and students like to think they're rational when it comes to picking a college and paying for it. They aren't.

Text is http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904332804576538312219660354.html#articleTabs%3Darticle and Link is
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405311190433280457653...

----------------------------------------------

As a whole, was an interesting article.

But, then there was this sentence: "The way people think about debt, for instance, may leave them borrowing too little, rather than the right amount."

& this one:

"But it's just as important not to take on too little debt."

I don't know - I just don't know what that is supposed to mean. I come from a family who has managed college just fine with NO DEBT. Our parents. Our cousins. Our siblings. Us. & that didn't just fall out of the sky. It was a VERY conscious decision and mindset.

It's not as simple as a debt debate though. I've borrowed money to buy a home. Clearly I am not 100% debt adverse.

So, I think I know what bothered me about this article. It was all about investing in a college education, and how important that is.

Fair enough, on some levels. BUT, is investing this kind of money in a 17 or 18-year-old child, using debt, really that wise? Personally, I think it is a pretty terrible investment in majority of cases.

For reference, I graduated high school at the top of my class. Most of the kids I graduated with were going somewhere and attended prestigious colleges. Most of them spent their late 20s trying to figure out what they really wanted to do and how to pay for the education that had decided they really wanted and needed. Because, they had blown all the money they had, and probably money they didn't had, on an undergrad degree they didn't use.

Could just be a coincidence of circumstances, but everyone I know that went to State actually hit the ground running in their careers, really knew what they wanted to do, etc. Sure, I have a friend who went to Stanford and is very successful, but for the most part all that comes to mind is classmates who were working at Target when they turned 30. MANY of them still lived with their parents. & these are the *bright* ones.

I kind of see it a lot with my wealthier clients. They hand their kids whatever, and they live at home, don't work, take it for granted, etc. I just don't see a lot of people paying the big bucks for college and doing much with it.

I am personally committed to not tying up all our resources when our kids are 18 - leaving them in a position that leaves them with severely limited options down the road.

It's not just that I am so debt adverse that it is crippling. It's kind of like I don't see the point to pour all that money in such a young person. I am very open to feeling differently and being very supportive if my child REALLY knows what their passion and career goals are. BUT - I don't see why I can't plan to pay cash for that. *shrugs*

---------------------------------------------------

But it also begs the question... Have you ever regretted taking too little debt? Just curious. Can't say I have any regrets of that variety.

6 Responses to “Regretting Too Little Debt? More on College”

  1. LuckyRobin Says:
    1316474148

    Nope, quite the opposite. And I kind of think it's a stupid statement for them to make, too.

  2. baselle Says:
    1316489445

    I see that howmuchamonth thinking is alive and well even after near-credit apocalypse of 2008. I would also bet that in 2005 this personal lack-of-finance writer also expounded on taking out a HELOC instead of having an emergency fund. Some people never learn.

  3. MonkeyMama Says:
    1316529784

    Oh yeah, Baselle. That was the other quote I forgot to pull. Something about how parents do think short-term about total costs, but should be thinking long-term about simply how much the payments are. !!!

    Yeah, so the article was not all bad, but the financial parts were pretty terrible.

  4. ceejay74 Says:
    1316554349

    That's just an asinine statement--both of them. If I were really generous, I would say they were just communicating badly and that what they meant was if a student has a certain vision--to become a doctor or something--they shouldn't let debt aversion stop them from going to the right school for them.

    But it's written pretty unequivocably in a way that says if you don't take on enough debt, you're making a mistake. And that's just not a sentence that makes logical sense. If one can achieve what one wants without taking on a lot of debt, would you take on more than you needed just so you fit within certain parameters of indebtedness? If I'd been editing this article for WSJ, I'd be sending it back with angry red marks all over it. Smile

  5. baselle Says:
    1316634197

    Why are the 'rents involved in the first place? The student should shoulder most of the risk.

  6. MonkeyMama Says:
    1316634874

    Because the parents need to cosign for all the BIG loans. Right? Big Grin

Leave a Reply

(Note: If you were logged in, we could automatically fill in these fields for you.)
*
Will not be published.
   

* Please spell out the number 4.  [ Why? ]

vB Code: You can use these tags: [b] [i] [u] [url] [email]